|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Y. Baruch , S. Sullivan , H. SchepmyerPublisher: Palgrave USA Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan Edition: 2006 ed. Dimensions: Width: 14.00cm , Height: 2.00cm , Length: 21.60cm Weight: 0.521kg ISBN: 9781403992239ISBN 10: 1403992231 Pages: 262 Publication Date: 12 April 2006 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Tertiary & Higher Education , Undergraduate Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsList of Tables and Figures Foreword: T.Lee Preface; Y.Baruch, S.E.Sullivan & H.Schepmyer Acknowledgements Notes on Contributors PART 1: THE ART AND SCIENCE OF REVIEWING Peer Reviews in the Production of Knowledge: Why I Stopped Worrying and learned to Appreciate the Flaws in the Review Process; R.L.Dipboye Reviewing as a Vital Professional Service; R.L.Priem & A.A.Rasheed To Review or Not to Review: When You Shouldn't Accept a Request to Review; A.M.Ryan PART 2: THE PRACTICE OF REVIEWING The Fundamentals of Reviewing; S.Sullivan, M.Crocitto, & S.M.Carraher Fairness as a Key Criterion in Reviewing; D.L.Shapiro & S.B.Sitkin Advice for the Novice Reviewer; H.Schepmyer, H.van Emmerik & C.Oliver The Effectiveness of the Reviewing Process; W.Starbuck, A.G.Bedeian & J.B.Miner PART 3: REVIEWING DIFFERENT TYPES OF WORKS Reviewing for Academic Journals: Qualitative-based Manuscripts; C.L.Cooper & J.Burgoyne Reviewing by the Numbers: Evaluating Quantitative Research; T.A.Scandura, J.G.Hunt & S.G.Baugh Reviewing for Scholarly Practitioner Journals; S.M.Puffer, J.Campbell Quick & D.J.McCarthy Reviewing Scholarly Books; W.Nord PART 4: ANSWERING REVIEWS TO GET PUBLISHED Revising to Be Published: Building Trust to Win the Acceptance of Journal Editors and Reviewers; S.A.Zahra & D.O.Neubaum To Revise and Resubmit or Not: That is the Question; Y.Baruch & Y.Altman Communicating More Effectively with Editors: Strategies for Authors and Reviewers; D.C.Feldman IndexReviewsThis book fills a void that has existed for too long: an examination of the process of reviewing scholarly writing in organizational and managerial spheres. As such, it is an indispensable volume for the shelves of both faculty members and PhD students who aspire to contribute to the literature in their fields as participants in the reviewing process. An all-star line-up of contributors brings order, coherence and perspective to a sometimes hit-or-miss activity. -- Dr. Lyman W. Porter, Professor Emeritus, University of California <br> Peer review is the gold standard in academia: all that makes academic journals valuable to scholars and society rests on the rigorous, blind assessment fellow scholars voluntary provide. Winning Reviews: A Guide for Evaluating Scholarly Writing shines a warm, bright light on the critical contributions reviewing makes to knowledge development, academic community building, and to the lives of review recipients and contributors. -- Denise Rousseau, Carnegie Mellon University, USA This book fills a void that has existed for too long: an examination of the process of reviewing scholarly writing in organizational and managerial spheres. As such, it is an indispensable volume for the shelves of both faculty members and PhD students who aspire to contribute to the literature in their fields as participants in the reviewing process. An all-star line-up of contributors brings order, coherence and perspective to a sometimes hit-or-miss activity. -- Dr. Lyman W. Porter, Professor Emeritus, University of California <br> Peer review is the gold standard in academia: all that makes academic journals valuable to scholars and society rests on the rigorous, blind assessment fellow scholars voluntary provide. Winning Reviews: A Guide for Evaluating Scholarly Writing shines a warm, bright light on the critical contributions reviewing makes to knowledge development, academic community building, and to the lives of review recipients and contributors. -- Denise Rousseau, Carn 'This book fills a void that has existed for too long: an examination of the process of reviewing scholarly writing in organizational and managerial spheres. As such, it is an indispensable volume for the shelves of both faculty members and PhD students who aspire to contribute to the literature in their fields as participants in the reviewing process. An all-star line-up of contributors brings order, coherence and perspective to a sometimes hit-or-miss activity.' - Dr. Lyman W. Porter, Professor Emeritus, University of California, USA 'Peer review is the gold standard in academia: all that makes academic journals valuable to scholars and society rests on the rigorous, blind assessment fellow scholars voluntary provide. Winning Reviews: A Guide for Evaluating Scholarly Writing shines a warm, bright light on the critical contributions reviewing makes to knowledge development, academic community building, and to the lives of review recipients and contributors.' - Denise Rousseau, Carnegie Mellon University, USA Author InformationYEHUDA BARUCH spent over ten years as a Career Officer in the Israeli Air Force and as Project Manager in the high tech industry before earning his doctorate. He is Professor of Management at the University of East Anglia, UK, and has published over 70 articles in refereed journals. He is author of Managing Careers: Theory and Practice (FT/Prentice-Hall/ Pearson) and is the journal editor of Career Development International. He is past Careers Division Chair, the Academy of Management. SHERRY SULLIVAN is currently Associate Professor (Tenured) in the Department of Manageme Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |