Overview

Full Product Details

9780271081267

Table of Contents

Reviews

Votes that Count and Voters Who Don't offers a rich understanding of how the language of news reports on presidential elections often impacts voter participation and turnout negatively. The centerpiece of this analysis is a nuanced content analysis of the trends in the appearance of three key words--vote, voter, and voting--in news reports across a sixty-eight-year period. Supplemented by experimental data and interviews with journalists, these results identify ways that news reports can enhance participation in elections. --Maxwell McCombs, author of Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion Jarvis and Han report that American journalists over six decades have inadvertently put campaign strategists in the driver's seat and rendered voters as mere passengers. Moreover, campaign journalists were surprised that their concern for debunking strategists had undermined their attention to voters as active participants. Citizens disliked stories treating them as spectators and preferred stories treating then as empowered participants. This book offers important insights and a pathway toward improved campaign journalism and voting. --Craig Allen Smith, author of Presidential Campaign Communication: The Quest for the White House Votes That Count and Voters Who Don't will be invaluable reading for scholars, journalists, and citizens who care about elections--not just about who wins them, or the microscopic analysis of voting behavior, but about the fundamental exercise of power that elections represent. Jarvis and Han show us how it matters when journalists portray voters as those who are acted upon rather than as empowered democratic actors. --Regina G. Lawrence, Executive Director, George S. Turnbull Portland Center and Agora Journalism Center, University of Oregon Why are reporters constantly tempted to predict--or even to declare--election results before people even vote? In this fascinating book, Jarvis and Han identify a growing attitude of dismissiveness that echoes academic research on easily manipulated citizens and reinforces the public's cynicism about democracy. They show that this condescension has serious consequences. The authors' analytical rigor is matched by their respect and concern for everyday people: a rare and worthy combination. --Peter Levine, author of We Are the Ones We Have Been Waiting For: The Promise of Civic Renewal in America

Votes That Count and Voters Who Don't will be invaluable reading for scholars, journalists, and citizens who care about elections-not just about who wins them, or the microscopic analysis of voting behavior, but about the fundamental exercise of power that elections represent. Jarvis and Han show us how it matters when journalists portray voters as those who are acted upon rather than as empowered democratic actors. -Regina G. Lawrence, Executive Director, George S. Turnbull Portland Center and Agora Journalism Center, University of Oregon Votes that Count and Voters Who Don't offers a rich understanding of how the language of news reports on presidential elections often impacts voter participation and turnout negatively. The centerpiece of this analysis is a nuanced content analysis of the trends in the appearance of three key words--vote, voter, and voting--in news reports across a sixty-eight-year period. Supplemented by experimental data and interviews with journalists, these results identify ways that news reports can enhance participation in elections. -Maxwell McCombs, author of Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion Jarvis and Han report that American journalists over six decades have inadvertently put campaign strategists in the driver's seat and rendered voters as mere passengers. Moreover, campaign journalists were surprised that their concern for debunking strategists had undermined their attention to voters as active participants. Citizens disliked stories treating them as spectators and preferred stories treating then as empowered participants. This book offers important insights and a pathway toward improved campaign journalism and voting. -Craig Allen Smith, author of Presidential Campaign Communication: The Quest for the White House Why are reporters constantly tempted to predict-or even to declare-election results before people even vote? In this fascinating book, Jarvis and Han identify a growing attitude of dismissiveness that echoes academic research on easily manipulated citizens and reinforces the public's cynicism about democracy. They show that this condescension has serious consequences. The authors' analytical rigor is matched by their respect and concern for everyday people: a rare and worthy combination. -Peter Levine, author of We Are the Ones We Have Been Waiting For: The Promise of Civic Renewal in America

Provocative just in its title alone, Sharon E. Jarvis and Soo-Hye Han's Votes That Count and Voters Who Don't: How Journalists Sideline Electoral Participation (Without Even Knowing It) is more insightful than the usual complaints about American politics devolving into a horse race in an echo chamber. --Scott McLemee, Inside Higher Ed Votes That Count and Voters Who Don't will be invaluable reading for scholars, journalists, and citizens who care about elections--not just about who wins them, or the microscopic analysis of voting behavior, but about the fundamental exercise of power that elections represent. Jarvis and Han show us how it matters when journalists portray voters as those who are acted upon rather than as empowered democratic actors. --Regina G. Lawrence, Executive Director, George S. Turnbull Portland Center and Agora Journalism Center, University of Oregon Votes that Count and Voters Who Don't offers a rich understanding of how the language of news reports on presidential elections often impacts voter participation and turnout negatively. The centerpiece of this analysis is a nuanced content analysis of the trends in the appearance of three key words--vote, voter, and voting--in news reports across a sixty-eight-year period. Supplemented by experimental data and interviews with journalists, these results identify ways that news reports can enhance participation in elections. --Maxwell McCombs, author of Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion Jarvis and Han report that American journalists over six decades have inadvertently put campaign strategists in the driver's seat and rendered voters as mere passengers. Moreover, campaign journalists were surprised that their concern for debunking strategists had undermined their attention to voters as active participants. Citizens disliked stories treating them as spectators and preferred stories treating then as empowered participants. This book offers important insights and a pathway toward improved campaign journalism and voting. --Craig Allen Smith, author of Presidential Campaign Communication: The Quest for the White House Why are reporters constantly tempted to predict--or even to declare--election results before people even vote? In this fascinating book, Jarvis and Han identify a growing attitude of dismissiveness that echoes academic research on easily manipulated citizens and reinforces the public's cynicism about democracy. They show that this condescension has serious consequences. The authors' analytical rigor is matched by their respect and concern for everyday people: a rare and worthy combination. --Peter Levine, author of We Are the Ones We Have Been Waiting For: The Promise of Civic Renewal in America

Author Information

Edward Jarvis is Fellow of the Royal Asiatic Society and the Royal Anthropological Institute. He is the author of Sede Vacante: The Life and Legacy of Archbishop Thục and Carlos Duarte Costa: Testament of a Socialist Bishop.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available