|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Joshua P. Graham , Thomas G. MarlowPublisher: Oxford University Press Inc Imprint: Oxford University Press Inc Dimensions: Width: 15.60cm , Height: 2.30cm , Length: 23.30cm Weight: 0.634kg ISBN: 9780199740628ISBN 10: 0199740623 Pages: 388 Publication Date: 08 June 2011 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Replaced By: 9780199926688 Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Unknown Availability: In Print Limited stock is available. It will be ordered for you and shipped pending supplier's limited stock. Table of ContentsINTRODUCTION REJECTIONS AND RESPONSES 1000 35 U.S.C. 101 INVENTIONS PATENTABLE. 2000 35 U.S.C. 102 CONDITIONS FOR PATENTABILITY; NOVELTY AND LOSS OF RIGHT TO PATENT. 3000 35 U.S.C. 103 CONDITIONS FOR PATENTABILITY, NON-OBVIOUS SUBJECT MATTER. 4000 35 U.S.C. 112 SPECIFICATION. 5000 DOUBLE PATENTING 6000 35 U.S.C. 171 PATENTS FOR DESIGN. 7000 35 U.S.C. 251 REISSUE OF DEFECTIVE PATENTS. 8000 RES JUDICATA STATUTES TABLE OF CASES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES INDEXReviews<br> After reviewing Graham & Marlow's new desk reference for patent prosecution, I kept asking myself why no one had ever published anything like this before. In short, this is an absolutely wonderful resource for patent prosecutors who need to quickly draft effective and authoritative responses to a myriad of different USPTO rejections. You can either spend hours delving through a confusing array of regulations and court decisions, or you can pick up this desk reference and get the guidance and authorities you need for most prosecution questions in less than two minutes. I would strongly recommend it for any prosecutor. <br><br>- Steven W. Lundberg <br>Patent attorney and a founding partner of Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner<p><br> The U.S. Patent Prosecutor's Desk Reference is an essential practice guide for every patent attorney. It is much easier to rebut an Examiner's rejection when you have at your fingertips a collection of decisions by the CAFC, CCPA and BPAI in which the Examiner's rejection was reversed. Because these decisions are organized by rejection type, you can quickly find authority to bolster your argument that a particular rejection is improper. Using this reference will make even experienced patent prosecutors more efficient and effective. <br><br>- Ann McCrackin <br>Professor of Law and Director of the Patent Prosecution Program <br>University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)<p><br> <br> After reviewing Graham & Marlow's new desk reference for patent prosecution, I kept asking myself why no one had ever published anything like this before. In short, this is an absolutely wonderful resource for patent prosecutors who need to quickly draft effective and authoritative responses to a myriad of different USPTO rejections. You can either spend hours delving through a confusing array of regulations and court decisions, or you can pick up this desk reference and get the guidance and authorities you need for most prosecution questions in less than two minutes. I would strongly recommend it for any prosecutor. <br>- Steven W. Lundberg <br>Patent attorney and a founding partner of Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner<p><br> The U.S. Patent Prosecutor's Desk Reference is an essential practice guide for every patent attorney. It is much easier to rebut an Examiner's rejection when you have at your fingertips a collection of decisions by the CAFC, CCPA and BPAI in which the Exam Author InformationJoshua P. Graham is Patent Counsel for Research In Motion, where he is a patent prosecutor and portfolio manager for the Advanced Technology group. Previously, he worked for Merchant and Gould, where his practice focused on patent litigation and appeals as well as proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Mr. Graham was also a judicial intern for the Honorable Steven J. McAuliffe, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. Thomas G. Marlow is Intellectual Property Counsel and Director at Fairchild Semiconductor, where he manages worldwide product line and business unit patent strategy, enforcement, and procurement. His work includes generating a strong intellectual property portfolio around Fairchild's current and future technology focus areas. Previously, Mr. Marlow worked for Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, where his patent practice included prosecution and analysis of technologies in the electronic arts, including semiconductors, integrated circuit design and fabrication, wireless communications, and computer networks. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |