Overview

Full Product Details

9781108419826

Table of Contents

Reviews

'In this powerfully argued and beautifully clear work, Jacob Eisler gives us a framework for understanding a dilemma at the core of modern liberal democracy. Though the 'counter-majoritarian difficulty' is familiar, Eisler introduces the more troubling 'counterpopular dilemma': how can courts police democratic processes. Through a careful exposition of the ideals of election law in light of the principles of democracy, Eisler provides an essential guide to making courts safe for democracy. More importantly, he gives us a map for remaking a democracy that might live up to its ideals.' Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School 'Election law has long ignored a question that should be at its core: Why should unaccountable judges – not the regular political process – decide the kind of democracy we live in? This sophisticated book, grounded in both democratic theory and legal doctrine, finally focuses on judicial review of electoral regulation. Its persuasive claim is that courts' role in this area must be forever unsettled, always grappling with disputes among different theories of liberty and equality but never definitely resolving them.' Nicholas Stephanopoulos, Harvard Law School 'Eisler draws on important doctrines in the the philosophy literature to inform what had been an intractable debate about the legitimacy of judicial review over the democratic process. The book is a must read for anyone seeking a theoretically sound justification for why the interests of the people must be paramount when courts resolve questions implicating democratic design, rights, and governance.' Franita Tolson, University of Southern California Gould School of Law

'In this powerfully argued and beautifully clear work, Jacob Eisler gives us a framework for understanding a dilemma at the core of modern liberal democracy. Though the 'counter-majoritarian difficulty' is familiar, Eisler introduces the more troubling 'counterpopular dilemma': how can courts police democratic processes. Through a careful exposition of the ideals of election law in light of the principles of democracy, Eisler provides an essential guide to making courts safe for democracy. More importantly, he gives us a map for remaking a democracy that might live up to its ideals.' Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School 'Election law has long ignored a question that should be at its core: Why should unaccountable judges—not the regular political process—decide the kind of democracy we live in? This sophisticated book, grounded in both democratic theory and legal doctrine, finally focuses on judicial review of electoral regulation. Its persuasive claim is that courts' role in this area must be forever unsettled, always grappling with disputes among different theories of liberty and equality but never definitely resolving them.' Nick Stephanopolous, Harvard Law School 'Eisler draws on important doctrines in the the philosophy literature to inform what had been an intractable debate about the legitimacy of judicial review over the democratic process. The book is a must read for anyone seeking a theoretically sound justification for why the interests of the people must be paramount when courts resolve questions implicating democratic design, rights, and governance.' Franita Tolson, University of Southern California Gould School of Law

'In this powerfully argued and beautifully clear work, Jacob Eisler gives us a framework for understanding a dilemma at the core of modern liberal democracy. Though the 'counter-majoritarian difficulty' is familiar, Eisler introduces the more troubling 'counterpopular dilemma': how can courts police democratic processes. Through a careful exposition of the ideals of election law in light of the principles of democracy, Eisler provides an essential guide to making courts safe for democracy. More importantly, he gives us a map for remaking a democracy that might live up to its ideals.' Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School 'Election law has long ignored a question that should be at its core: Why should unaccountable judges-not the regular political process-decide the kind of democracy we live in? This sophisticated book, grounded in both democratic theory and legal doctrine, finally focuses on judicial review of electoral regulation. Its persuasive claim is that courts' role in this area must be forever unsettled, always grappling with disputes among different theories of liberty and equality but never definitely resolving them.' Nick Stephanopolous, Harvard Law School 'Eisler draws on important doctrines in the the philosophy literature to inform what had been an intractable debate about the legitimacy of judicial review over the democratic process. The book is a must read for anyone seeking a theoretically sound justification for why the interests of the people must be paramount when courts resolve questions implicating democratic design, rights, and governance.' Franita Tolson, University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Author Information

Jacob Eisler is Associate Professor at the University of Southampton Law School where he focuses on democratic theory, election law, and corruption. In 2023, he will join Florida State University College of Law as the James Edmund and Margaret Elizabeth Corry Professor.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available