Free Delivery Over $100
|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewMedia coverage of the Supreme Court of Canada has emerged as a crucial factor not only for judges and journalists but also for the public. It’s the media, after all, that decide which court rulings to cover and how. They translate highly complex judgments into concise and meaningful news stories that will appeal to, and be understood by, the general public. Thus, judges lose control of the message once they hand down decisions, and journalists have the last word. To show how the Supreme Court has fared under the media spotlight, Sauvageau, Schneiderman, and Taras examine a year in the life of the court and then focus on the media coverage of four high-profile decisions: the Marshall case, about Aboriginal rights; the Vriend case, about gay rights; the Quebec Secession Reference; and the Sharpe child pornography case. They explore the differences between television and newspaper coverage, national and regional reporting, and the French- and English-language media. They also describe how judges and journalists understand and interact with one another amid often-clashing legal and journalistic cultures, offering a rich and detailed account of the relationship between two of the most important institutions in Canadian life. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Florian Sauvageau , David Schneiderman , David Taras , Ruth KlinkhammerPublisher: University of British Columbia Press Imprint: University of British Columbia Press Edition: New edition Weight: 0.400kg ISBN: 9780774812443ISBN 10: 0774812443 Pages: 272 Publication Date: 06 December 2005 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Out of stock  The supplier is temporarily out of stock of this item. It will be ordered for you on backorder and shipped when it becomes available. Table of ContentsAcknowledments Judgment Day: A Vignette Introduction: The Supreme Court Under the Media Lens 1 A Year in the Life of the Supreme Court 2 Equal in Alberta: The Vriend Case 3 Court and Spin Country: The Quebec Secession Reference 4 “Sea of Confusion”: R. v. Marshall 5 “Parents Can Sleep Soundly”: The Queen v. John Robin Sharpe 6 Judges and Journalists Conclusion: Reporting the Supreme Court through a Political Prism Appendix A: Interview Questions Appendix B: Method of Analysis -- Coding Instructions and Sample Code Sheet About the Authors IndexReviewsFor the first word on a complex subject, they have produced a book that is thought-provoking, authoritative, impeccably researched and grounded in reality. -- Kirk Martin Literary Review of Canada Author InformationFlorian Sauvageau is Professor of Communications at Université Laval in Québec and Director of the Centre d’études sur les médias/Centre for Media Studies. David Schneiderman is Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Toronto. David Taras is University Professor and Professor in the Faculty of Communication and Culture at the University of Calgary. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
