Free Delivery Over $100
|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewThe fight between North and South over intellectual property (IP) reached new heights in the 1990s. In one corner, large multinational companies and developed countries sought to protect their investments. Opposing them, developing countries argued for the time and scope to pursue development strategies unshackled by rules forged to bolster the competitiveness of richer countries. The result was the WTO's deeply contested Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Widely resented by developing countries, TRIPS nonetheless permits them some hard-won flexibility. Puzzling, however, is why some developing countries have used that flexibility and others have not. Even more curious is that many of the poorest countries have made least use of the room for manouevre, despite securing some extra concessions.For developing countries, TRIPS did not end the pro-IP offensive. At the urging of industry lobbyists, powerful countries backtracked on the flexibilities in TRIPS and pursued even stronger global IP rules. To prevent precedents for weaker IP standards in poorer countries, they issued threats to market access, aid, investment, and political alliances. Further, they used new trade deals and, more subtly, capacity building (assisted by the World Intellectual Property Organization, among others) to leverage faster compliance and higher standards than TRIPS requires. Meanwhile, 'pro-development' advocates from civil society, other UN agencies, and developingcountries worked to counter 'compliance-plus' pressures and defend the use of TRIPS flexibilities, sometimes with success. Within developing countries, most governments had little experience of IP laws and deferred TRIPS implementation to IP offices cut-off from trade politics and national policymaking, making them more vulnerable to the TRIPS-plus agenda. In many of the poorest Africancountries, regional IP arrangements magnified this effect.For scholars of international political economy and law, this book is the first detailed exploration of the links between global IP politics and the implementation of IP reforms. It exposes how power politics occur not just within global trade talks but afterwards when countries implement agreements. The Implementation Game will be of interest to all those engaged in debates on the global governance oftrade and IP Full Product DetailsAuthor: Carolyn Deere (Director, Global Trade Governance Project, Global Economic Governance Programme, University College, Oxford)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 16.30cm , Height: 3.00cm , Length: 24.10cm Weight: 0.794kg ISBN: 9780199550616ISBN 10: 0199550611 Pages: 428 Publication Date: 30 October 2008 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order  Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of ContentsList of Figures and Tables Preface List of Abbreviations 1: The TRIPS Implementation Game: A Fight for Ideas 2: Developing Countries in the Global IP System 3: Variation in TRIPS Implementation (1995-2007) 4: Post-TRIPS Tensions and Global IP Debates 5: International Pressures on Developing Countries 6: The Developing Country Dimension: How National Politics Mattered 7: TRIPS Implementation in Francophone Africa 8: The Implementation Game and the Variation Puzzle Appendices Bibliography IndexReviewsAuthor InformationDr. Carolyn Deere is the Director of the Global Trade Governance Project at the Global Economic Governance Programme, University College, Oxford. She is also a Senior Research Associate at Oxford University's Centre for International Studies. Dr. Deere is the founder and Chair of the Board of Intellectual Property Watch - the leading news service on international intellectual property policymaking. She is also a Resident Scholar at the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) in Geneva, Switzerland. Dr. Deere's publications include 'Greening the Americas: NAFTA's Lessons for Hemispheric Trade' (co-edited with Dan Esty, MIT Press, 2001). She holds a DPhil in International Relations (University College, Oxford), an MA in International Relations (Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS)), and a degree in political economy from the University of Sydney. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
