|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewCourts are often thought of as protectors of minority rights. What happens when the composition of courts changes such that politically disadvantaged groups expect a less favorable reception? This Element examines whether the increasing conservatism of the US Supreme Court during Donald Trump's presidency changed the behavior of litigants and amicus curiae. The authors test whether membership changes led to reduced filings by individuals and organizations representing marginalized groups and increased filings by businesses and conservative states and interest groups. The authors find substantial reductions in participation by the most politically disadvantaged and substantial increases in participation by the most conservative groups. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Kirsten Widner (University of Tennessee) , Anna Gunderson (Knoxville & Louisiana State University)Publisher: Cambridge University Press Imprint: Cambridge University Press ISBN: 9781009519656ISBN 10: 1009519654 Pages: 75 Publication Date: 31 December 2024 Audience: College/higher education , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Forthcoming Availability: Not yet available, will be POD This item is yet to be released. You can pre-order this item and we will dispatch it to you upon it's release. This is a print on demand item which is still yet to be released. Table of Contents1. Introduction: supreme court membership change and its consequences; 2. Changes in petitioner behavior; 3. Changes in amicus behavior; 4. Elections have consequences: looking beyond trump's justices; References.ReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |