Free Delivery Over $100
|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewThe amicus curiae – or friend of the court – is the main mechanism for actors other than the parties, including civil society actors and states, to participate directly in proceedings in international criminal tribunals. Yet reliance on this mechanism raises a number of significant questions concerning: the functions performed by amici, which actors seek to intervene and why, and the influence of amicus interventions on judicial outcomes. Ultimately, the amicus curiae may have a significant impact on the fairness, representativeness and legitimacy of the tribunals’ proceedings and decisions. This book provides a comprehensive examination of the amicus curiae practice of the International Criminal Court and other major international criminal tribunals and offers suggestions for the role of the amicus curiae. In doing so, the authors develop a framework to augment the potential contributions of amicus participation in respect of the legitimacy of international criminal tribunals and their decisions, while minimising interference with the core judicial competence of the tribunal and the right of the accused to a fair and expeditious trial. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Ms Sarah Williams , Dr Hannah Woolaver , Ms Emma PalmerPublisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC Imprint: Hart Publishing Weight: 0.594kg ISBN: 9781509954704ISBN 10: 1509954708 Pages: 424 Publication Date: 26 August 2021 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand  We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of Contents1. International Criminal Tribunals, Legitimacy and the Amicus Curiae I. Introduction II. Why International Criminal Tribunals? And Which Ones? III. Legitimacy in International Criminal Justice IV. Legitimacy and the Amicus Curiae V. Method and Chapter Overview 2. The Amicus Curiae in Comparative Perspective I. Adopting a Functional Approach II. Standing to Bring a Claim III. Joinder of Claims and Cases IV. Intervention V. The Amicus Curiae: A Friend of the Court VI. Relevance of Comparative Practice to International Criminal Tribunals 3. The Amicus Curiae in International Criminal Tribunals: An Introduction I. Overview II. Standing in International Criminal Tribunals III. History of Amicus Curiae Participation in International Criminal Tribunals IV. The Amicus Curiae Prosecutor and the Prosecutor as Amicus Curiae V. Limits on Amicus Curiae Participation VI. The Amicus Curiae and Other Mechanisms for Expertise, Representation and Communication VII. Conclusion 4. The Amicus Curiae in International Criminal Tribunals in Practice I. Introduction II. Who Can Participate as an Amicus Curiae? III. When Can an Amicus Curiae Participate? IV. How do Amici Curiae Participate? V. Substantive Criteria for Admitting Amici Curiae VI. Impact of Amicus Curiae Submissions VII. Participation in ICC Reparations Proceedings VIII. Conclusions 5. Civil Society Actors as Amici Curiae I. Introduction II. Overview of Civil Society Actors at International Criminal Tribunals III. The Expertise Function and Civil Society Actors IV. Representation of Interests by Civil Society as Amici Curiae V. The Communicative Function and Civil Society VI. Impact of Civil Society Amicus Curiae Submissions VII. Conclusion 6. The Amicus Curiae and the Defence I. Introduction II. Overview of Defence Amicus Curiae Practice III. The Defence and the Provision of Expertise through the Amicus Curiae IV. The Use of the Amicus Curiae to Represent the Interests of the Defence V. The Communicative Function and the Defence VI. Conclusion 7. Representing State Interests I. Introduction II. Overview of State and International Organisation Amicus Curiae Practice III. State and International Organisation Amici Providing Expertise IV. The State or International Organisation Amici Representing an Interest V. State Amici Performing a Communicative Function VI. The Challenge of Engaging Reluctant or Resistant States VII. Conclusion 8. ConclusionReviewsThe exploration of legitimacy throughout the text is highly effective ... the authors' decision to adopt both an analytical and normative approach to the role of the amicus means that the text functions at multiple levels of usefulness to academia and practitioners alike. -- Molly Thomas, International Criminal Court, The Hague, the Netherlands * Human Rights Law Review * Author InformationSarah Williams is Professor at the Faculty of Law, UNSW Sydney. Hannah Woolaver is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town. Emma Palmer is a Lecturer at Griffith Law School, Griffith University. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
