|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewThere is presently a debate between Subjectivists and Objectivists about moral wrongness. Subjectivism is the view that the moral status of our actions, whether they are morally wrong or not, is grounded in our subjective circumstances – either our beliefs about, or our evidence concerning, the world around us. Objectivism, on the other hand, is the view that the moral status of our actions is grounded in our objective circumstances – all those facts other than those which comprise our subjective circumstances. A third view, Ecumenism, has it that the moral status of our actions is grounded both in our subjective and our objective circumstances. After outlining and evaluating the various arguments both against Subjectivism and against Objectivism, this Element offers a tentative defense of Objectivism about moral wrongness. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Peter A. Graham (University of Massachusetts, Amherst)Publisher: Cambridge University Press Imprint: Cambridge University Press Dimensions: Width: 15.10cm , Height: 0.50cm , Length: 22.90cm Weight: 0.120kg ISBN: 9781108706612ISBN 10: 1108706614 Pages: 75 Publication Date: 15 April 2021 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of Contents1. Subjectivism, Objectivism, and Ecumenism; 2. The Sense-Splitting Reply; 3. Against Objectivism; 4. Against Subjectivism; 5. Objectivism or Ecumenism?ReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |