Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide

Author:   Professor Cass R Sunstein (University of Chicago Law School University of Chicago University of Chicago Law School University of Chicago) ,  Reid Hastie, Dr (University of Colorado, Boulder) ,  John W Payne (Duke University, North Carolina) ,  David A Schkade
Publisher:   University of Chicago Press
ISBN:  

9781282537842


Pages:   298
Publication Date:   19 December 2008
Format:   Electronic book text
Availability:   In stock   Availability explained
We have confirmation that this item is in stock with the supplier. It will be ordered in for you and dispatched immediately.

Our Price $152.06 Quantity:  
Add to Cart

Share |

Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide


Add your own review!

Overview

Over the past two decades, the United States has seen a dramatic increase in the number and magnitude of punitive damages verdicts rendered by juries in civil trials. Probably the most extraordinary example is the July 2000 award of $144.8 billion in the Florida class action lawsuit brought against cigarette manufacturers. Or consider two recent verdicts against the auto manufacturer BMW in Alabama. In identical cases, argued in the same court before the same judge, one jury awarded $4 million in punitive damages, while the other awarded no punitive damages at all. In cases involving accidents, civil rights, and the environment, multimillion-dollar punitive awards have been a subject of intense controversy.
But how do juries actually make decisions about punitive damages? To find out, the authors-experts in psychology, economics, and the law-present the results of controlled experiments with more than 600 mock juries involving the responses of more than 8,000 jury-eligible citizens. Although juries tended to agree in their moral judgments about the defendant's conduct, they rendered erratic and unpredictable dollar awards. The experiments also showed that instead of moderating juror verdicts, the process of jury deliberation produced a striking severity shift toward ever-higher awards. Jurors also tended to ignore instructions from the judges; were influenced by whatever amount the plaintiff happened to request; showed hindsight bias, believing that what happened should have been foreseen; and penalized corporations that had based their decisions on careful cost-benefit analyses. While judges made many of the same errors, they performed better in some areas, suggesting that judges (or other specialists) may be better equipped than juries to decide punitive damages.
Using a wealth of new experimental data, and offering a host of provocative findings, this book documents a wide range of systematic biases in jury behavior. It will be indispensable for anyone interested not only in punitive damages, but also jury behavior, psychology, and how people think about punishment.

Full Product Details

Author:   Professor Cass R Sunstein (University of Chicago Law School University of Chicago University of Chicago Law School University of Chicago) ,  Reid Hastie, Dr (University of Colorado, Boulder) ,  John W Payne (Duke University, North Carolina) ,  David A Schkade
Publisher:   University of Chicago Press
Imprint:   University of Chicago Press
ISBN:  

9781282537842


ISBN 10:   1282537849
Pages:   298
Publication Date:   19 December 2008
Audience:   General/trade ,  General
Format:   Electronic book text
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   In stock   Availability explained
We have confirmation that this item is in stock with the supplier. It will be ordered in for you and dispatched immediately.

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

No review item found!

Add your own review!

Countries Available

All regions
Latest Reading Guide

Aorrng

Shopping Cart
Your cart is empty
Shopping cart
Mailing List