Overview

To anyone setting out to explore the entanglement of international criminal justice with the interests of States, Germany is a particularly curious, exemplary case. Although a liberal democracy since 1949, its political position has altered radically in the last 60 years. Starting from a position of harsh scepticism in the years following the Nuremberg Trials, and opening up to the rationales of international criminal justice only slowly - and then mainly in the context of domestic trials against functionaries of the former East German regime after 1990 - Germany is today one of the most active supporters of the International Criminal Court. The climax of this is its campaigning to make the ICC independent of the UN Security Council - a debate in which Germany took a position in stark contrast to the United States. This book offers new insight into the debates leading up to such policy shifts. Drawing on government documents and interviews with policymakers, it enriches a broader debate on the politics of international criminal justice which has to date often been focused primarily on the United States.

Full Product Details

Author:   Ronen Steinke
Publisher:   Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
Imprint:   Hart Publishing
Dimensions:   Width: 15.60cm , Height: 1.00cm , Length: 23.40cm
Weight:   0.395kg
ISBN:  

9781849463133

ISBN 10:   1849463131
Pages:   160
Publication Date:   25 May 2012
Audience:   Professional and scholarly ,  College/higher education ,  Professional & Vocational ,  Tertiary & Higher Education
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   Manufactured on demand  
We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier.

Table of Contents

Introduction 1 The Politics of 'Historical Truth': An Outline 1. 'Historical Truth' as a Goal and a Problem 2. Extreme Selectivity and Slices of Truth 3. The Need for Representative Case Selections 4. Are Objective Selections Possible? The Gravity Test 5. The Critical Systemic Role of the Prosecutor 6. Checks on the Prosecutor? The 'Accountability v Independence' Debate 7. Conclusion 2 German Objections to the Nuremberg Trials after 1949 1. The Allies in Control 2. Allied Priorities: Shaping the Historical Narrative 3. Germany and the nullum crimen Debate 4. Germany and the tu quoque Debate 5. Germany's Opposition to New Tribunals 5 6. Conclusion 3 Germany's Own GDR Trials after 1989 1. West Germany in Control 2. West German Narrative Interests 3. The U-Turn on nullum crimen 4. Conclusion 4 German Support for the UN Ad Hoc Tribunals in the 1990s 1. The UN Security Council in Control 2. Germany's Narrative Interests on the Balkans 3. Western Priorities: Shaping the Historical Narrative 814. Germany's Interests in New Tribunals 5. Conclusion 5 Germany's Role (and Stake) in the Creation of the ICC 1. Who Should Be in Control? 2. Originally, Germany Favoured UN Security Council Control 3. Then, Germany Argues for 'Independence' Instead 4. Remarkably, Idealist and Realists in Germany had Joined Hands 5. German Realists had Nothing to Lose from the Shift Towards Independence 6. More Importantly However, They had a Lot to Gain 7. Independence and the Crime of Aggression 8. Conclusion 1 6 Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Interests: Concluding Remarks

Reviews

Steinke's book is an excellent analysis of the politics behind Germany's evolving relationship with international criminal justice. The critique of legal debates over Nuremberg in the post-war Federal Republic of Germany contributes to making this sinister episode of German history accessible to an international readership. Most importantly, the study sheds new light on the country's both silent and spectacular u-turn on international criminal justice and offers innovative explanations for Germany's decision to oppose some of their closest allies by supporting an independent ICC.Paul Christoph BornkammJournal of International Criminal JusticeVolume 10, No. 4, September 2012This concise and extraordinarily dense investigation is a masterpiece. Steinke reports and analyses a central chapter of German and European foreign policy after the end of the Cold War, in a manner that is both true to detail and strong in its arguments. This exploration tells us something about German foreign policy and politics of memory, about the relationship between law and politics in international relations, about the politics of international law between power and justice. And all of that is fitted into 150 pages.Alexandra KemmererFrankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung30th June 2012

This concise and extraordinarily dense investigation is a masterpiece. Steinke reports and analyses a central chapter of German and European foreign policy after the end of the Cold War, in a manner that is both true to detail and strong in its arguments. This exploration tells us something about German foreign policy and politics of memory, about the relationship between law and politics in international relations, about the politics of international law between power and justice. And all of that is fitted into 150 pages.Alexandra KemmererFrankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung30th June 2012

This emphasis on political interests and motives is convincing, and it is important in order to help us put a rather idealistic and idealising view on international criminal justice into perspective. (translation from original) -- Professor. Dr. Eckart Conze Historische Zeitschrift, Volume 297, Number 2 ... a very worthy and stimulating contribution to an overlooked subject: the dual and intersecting politics of Germany and international criminal justice, a subject that is sure to appeal to graduate and undergraduate students of the politics of law, and to gain more attention in the coming years as the UN considers expanding its permanent membership to include Germany. -- Steven C. Roach Politics Studies Review, Volume 11, Number 3 What is of importance to Nigeria and Africa is the historiographic function of the ICC revealed by Steinke. -- Osuolale Alalade PM News Nigeria The narration of the genesis of the Internationl Criminal Court is nicely comprehensible especially through the interviews which the author has made with scholars of international law such as Ambos, Tomuschat, Kress and Zimmerman, and also with actors in Rome and The Hague such as Kaul, Wilkitzki and Brammertz. -- Otto Bohm Nuremberg Centre for Human Rights Website ...fluently written and enthralling to read. -- Prof. Thomas Vormbaum Zeitschrift Integrativer Europaischer Rechtsgeschichte This concise and extraordinarily dense investigation is a masterpiece. Steinke reports on and analyses a central chapter of German and European foreign policy after the end of the Cold War, in a manner that is both true to detail and strong in its arguments. This exploration tells us something about German foreign policy and politics of memory, about the relationship between law and politics in international relations, about the politics of international law between power and justice. And all this is fitted into 150 pages. -- Alexandra Kemmerer European Journal of International Law, Volume 23 The wealth of diplomatic material used by Steinke makes for riveting insights into the structures of international relationships and the discussions within the German government. (translated from the German original) -- Vasco Reuss Einsicht 08 - Bulletin des Fritz-Bauer-Instituts ...Steinke's work is a significant and important contribution to a literature which remains thin. Importantly, The Politics of International Criminal Justice... is much more than an assessment of Germany's role and contribution to international criminal law. It is an engaging and eloquent exposition on key developments in the politics of international criminal justice. -- Mark Kersten Justice in Conflict Blog Steinke's book is an excellent analysis of the politics behind Germany's evolving relationship with international criminal justice. The critique of legal debates over Nuremberg in the post-war Federal Republic of Germany contributes to making this sinister episode of German history accessible to an international readership. Most importantly, the study sheds new light on the country's both silent and spectacular u-turn on international criminal justice and offers innovative explanations for Germany's decision to oppose some of their closest allies by supporting an independent ICC. -- Paul Christoph Bornkamm Journal of International Criminal Justice, Volume 10, No. 4 This concise and extraordinarily dense investigation is a masterpiece. Steinke reports and analyses a central chapter of German and European foreign policy after the end of the Cold War, in a manner that is both true to detail and strong in its arguments. This exploration tells us something about German foreign policy and politics of memory, about the relationship between law and politics in international relations, about the politics of international law between power and justice. And all of that is fitted into 150 pages. -- Alexandra Kemmerer Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

Author Information

Ronen Steinke is a lawyer and a political journalist with Süddeutsche Zeitung.

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

No review item found!

Add your own review!

Countries Available

All regions