Overview

For most Americans, habeas corpus is the cornerstone of our legal system: the principal constitutional check on arbitrary government power, allowing an arrested person to challenge the legality of his detention. In a study that could not be more timely, Justin Wert reexamines this essential individual right and shows that habeas corpus is not necessarily the check that we’ve assumed. Habeas corpus, it emerges, is as much a tool of politics as it is of law. In this first study of habeas corpus in an American political context, Wert shifts our collective emphasis from the judicial to the political—toward the changes in the writ influenced by Congress, the president, political parties, state governments, legal academics, and even interest groups. By doing so, he reveals how political regimes have used habeas corpus both to undo the legacies of their predecessors and to establish and enforce their own vision of constitutional governance. Tracing the history of the writ from the Founding to Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Boumediene v. Bush, Wert illuminates crucial developmental moments in its evolution. He demonstrates that during the antebellum period, Reconstruction, Gilded Age, Great Society, and the ongoing war on terrorism, habeas corpus has waxed and waned in harmony with the interests of majoritarian politics. Along the way, Wert identifies and explains the political context of fine points of law that many political scientists and historians may not be aware of—such as the exhaustion rule requiring that a federal habeas participant must first exhaust all possible claims for relief in state court, a maneuver by which the post-Reconstruction Court abandoned supervision of race relations in the South. Especially in light of the new scrutiny of habeas corpus prompted by the Guantánamo detainees, Wert’s book is essential for broadening our understanding of how law and politics continue to intersect after 9/11. Brimming with fresh insights into constitutional development and regime theory, it shows that the Great Writ of Liberty may not be so great as we have supposed—because while it has the potential to enforce conceptions of rights that are consistent with the best ideals of American politics, it also has the potential to enforce its worst aspects as well.

Full Product Details

9780700617630

Table of Contents

Reviews

An excellent and much-needed study that focuses our attention on the politics that have always surrounded this important right. Keith E. Whittington, author of Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review

An excellent and much-needed study that focuses our attention on the politics that have always surrounded this important right. <b>Keith E. Whittington</b>, author of <i>Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review</i>

""This comprehensive historical work provides an invaluable resource for those studying the role of the federal courts in our nation's history.""--American Historical Review ""Instead of telling a traditional story in which the court uses the writ to protect minorities, he offers a more nuanced one about how the courts, in their use and non-use of the writ, have served the policy goals of the dominant political regime of their time. . . . Wert persuasively argues that even seemingly fundamental principles like habeas corpus are shaped by short-term, partisan, political forces.""--Political Science Quarterly ""This book is uniquely valuable. Wert has fully mastered the relevant literature, and his account of events, particularly those in the decades surrounding the Civil War, is factually reliable and consistently readable.""--Journal of Interdisciplinary History ""This book adds some much-needed insights into our understanding of how and why the Court can maintain institutional independence in a system in which it has fundamental and strong ties to other political institutions.""--Law and Politics Book Review ""Wert's book contributes to the corpus about habeas corpus with a sweeping picture of the varied uses of habeas in America, connecting its development in peacetime with its better-known role in times of war.""--Review of Politics ""Wert's work situates habeas in a political, rather than exclusively legal or historical, context that reveals the nonlinear development of the fight, as as the contributions of political actors in shaping its contours and in deploying it in the service of a regime's larger vision of constitutional governance.""--Choice blurbs""An impressive and engaging account of how the Great Writ, designed as a fundamental protector of liberty, has been shaped and misshaped by political forces. Wert's history is a clarion call for a reaffirmation of the writ at its best.""--David Cole, author of Terrorism and the Constitution ""An excellent and much-needed study that focuses our attention on the politics that have always surrounded this important right.""--Keith E. Whittington, author of Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review ""An innovative history of habeas corpus that enhances our understanding of the way in which courts are part of political regimes.""--Mark Tushnet, author of Why the Constitution Matters

An excellent and much-needed study that focuses our attention on the politics that have always surrounded this important right. --Keith E. Whittington, author of Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review

Author Information

Justin J. Wert is the Second Century Presidential Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Oklahoma and recipient of the 2006 American Political Science Association's Edward S. Corwin Award.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available