Overview

A highly original account of the role that fear plays in key First Amendment cases ruled on by the Roberts Supreme Court In Fear and the First Amendment, Kevin A. Johnson and Craig R. Smith offer a deeply considered examination of the ways fear figures in First Amendment questions ruled on by the contemporary Supreme Court. Bringing together literature on theories of fear in rhetorical and philosophical traditions, Johnson and Smith focus on the rulings from the Roberts Court, which form a pivotal era of dramatic precedents. Each chapter in this book analyzes one or more First Amendment cases and a variety of related fears--whether evidentiary or not--that pertain to a given case. These cases include Morse v. Frederick, which takes up the competing fears of school administrators’ loss of authority and students’ loss of free speech rights. The authors touch on corporate funding of elections in Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission, from the fear of corporate influence on electoral politics to corporate fears of alienating their consumers by backing political candidates. They explore religious freedom and fears of homosexuality in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez. Similarly, in Snyder v. Phelps, the authors delve further into fears of God, death, emotional distress, failing as a parent, and losing one’s reputation. Next, they investigate parents’ anxieties about violence in video games in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association. Finally, Johnson and Smith examine the role of fear in indecent, obscene, and graphic communication in three cases: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union, and United States v. Stevens. Together these cases reveal fear to be an endemic factor in the rhetoric of First Amendment cases. This fascinating and original work will appeal to current legal practitioners and students of law, rhetoric, philosophy, and the First Amendment.

Full Product Details

9780817361457

Table of Contents

Reviews

“A whole host of fears may motivate calls to restrict First Amendment rights, prioritizing one fear over another. Fear and the First Amendment unveils these negotiations of various fears and related protections as they appear in the contemporary Supreme Court, showing that fear is significant and rhetorical in First Amendment conflicts.”—Katie Gibson, author of Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Legacy of Dissent: Feminist Rhetoric and the Law “Johnson and Smith deliver on their promise to interrogate the connection between fear and the First Amendment. This book is told in an accessible, narrative manner that keeps readers engaged throughout, while remaining rigorous and thorough. The cases they highlight are not just pertinent but turning points in 1A jurisprudence and necessary for any student or scholar of the First Amendment to grapple with, making this book an indispensable tool. Johnson and Smith also cover a number of other equally important, if not titular themes, such as the importance of constitutional philosophy and the fact that our rights are always contextual. Ultimately, this book would be a welcome addition to the library of anyone who wishes to further explore the First Amendment.”—M. Elizabeth Thorpe, associate professor at SUNY Brockport “Kevin Johnson and Craig Smith are to be lauded for situating the discussion of First Amendment SCOTUS cases within the province of fear. Their novel, erudite, yet wholly accessible approach connects the cases to watershed and lesser known events in the annals of American history. The volume is an interdisciplinary tour de force, speaking to scholars, instructors and students across a wide swath of disciplines and areas of scholarly inquiry including communication, rhetoric, history, political science, psychology, religion, and media studies. This volume provides prodigious clarity for a cohort of consequential cases within the Roberts court, and more edifying it could not be.  Kudos to Professors Johnson and Smith”—Adrienne E. Hacker Daniels, professor of Communication and Rhetorical Studies and A. Boyd Pixley Professor of Humanities at Illinois College “Fear and the First Amendment provides a deep dive into the rhetorical constructions of fear in pivotal First Amendment cases by focusing on this affective dimension’s impact on the People’s most cherished freedoms. Johnson and Smith provide rich and accessible analyses to help us better understand the Court’s complex decision-making processes as they attempt to strike a balance between our freedoms and their limitations, both now and as we move into an uncertain future.”—Billie Murray, author of Combating Hate and editor of Communication and Democracy “Johnson and Smith have provided an engaging, thorough account of the major First Amendment cases of the Roberts Court. In doing so, though, they make an arguably more important conceptual contribution by illuminating how the legal arguments in these cases are themselves predicated on a more fundamental stratum of rhetorical framing. As their analysis demonstrates, the rhetoric of fear has always played a critical role in First Amendment thought and will undoubtedly continue to do so given our current political climate”—Ben Medeiros, author of Reputation Management Online: America's Right to Be Forgotten

"""Fear and the First Amendment provides a deep dive into the rhetorical constructions of fear in pivotal First Amendment cases by focusing on this affective dimension's impact on the People's most cherished freedoms. Johnson and Smith provide rich and accessible analyses to help us better understand the Court's complex decision-making processes as they attempt to strike a balance between our freedoms and their limitations, both now and as we move into an uncertain future."" --Billie Murray, author of Combating Hate and editor of Communication and Democracy ""Johnson and Smith have provided an engaging, thorough account of the major First Amendment cases of the Roberts Court. In doing so, though, they make an arguably more important conceptual contribution by illuminating how the legal arguments in these cases are themselves predicated on a more fundamental stratum of rhetorical framing. As their analysis demonstrates, the rhetoric of fear has always played a critical role in First Amendment thought and will undoubtedly continue to do so given our current political climate"" --Ben Medeiros, author of Reputation Management Online: America's Right to Be Forgotten ""A whole host of fears may motivate calls to restrict First Amendment rights, prioritizing one fear over another. Fear and the First Amendment unveils these negotiations of various fears and related protections as they appear in the contemporary Supreme Court, showing that fear is significant and rhetorical in First Amendment conflicts."" --Katie Gibson, author of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Legacy of Dissent: Feminist Rhetoric and the Law ""Johnson and Smith deliver on their promise to interrogate the connection between fear and the First Amendment. This book is told in an accessible, narrative manner that keeps readers engaged throughout, while remaining rigorous and thorough. The cases they highlight are not just pertinent but turning points in 1A jurisprudence and necessary for any student or scholar of the First Amendment to grapple with, making this book an indispensable tool. Johnson and Smith also cover a number of other equally important, if not titular themes, such as the importance of constitutional philosophy and the fact that our rights are always contextual. Ultimately, this book would be a welcome addition to the library of anyone who wishes to further explore the First Amendment."" --M. Elizabeth Thorpe, associate professor at SUNY Brockport ""Kevin Johnson and Craig Smith are to be lauded for situating the discussion of First Amendment SCOTUS cases within the province of fear. Their novel, erudite, yet wholly accessible approach connects the cases to watershed and lesser known events in the annals of American history. The volume is an interdisciplinary tour de force, speaking to scholars, instructors and students across a wide swath of disciplines and areas of scholarly inquiry including communication, rhetoric, history, political science, psychology, religion, and media studies. This volume provides prodigious clarity for a cohort of consequential cases within the Roberts court, and more edifying it could not be. Kudos to Professors Johnson and Smith"" --Adrienne E. Hacker Daniels, professor of Communication and Rhetorical Studies and A. Boyd Pixley Professor of Humanities at Illinois College"

Author Information

Kevin A. Johnson is professor of communication studies at California State University, Long Beach, and director of the Center for First Amendment Studies. He has published over thirty scholarly articles and served as editor of the National Communication Association’s First Amendment Studies and Communication and Democracy journals. Craig R. Smith is emeritus professor of communication studies at California State University, Long Beach. He has published over twenty books and sixty-five scholarly articles.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available