Overview

A comparative analysis of four European Commission advisory forums comprising organized civil society actors, which investigates the conflict between the capacity of European Commission committee governance to improve system effectiveness, provide efficiency gains and sustain adequate democratic credentials.

Full Product Details

Author:   Karen Heard-Laureote (Portsmouth University, UK)
Publisher:   Taylor & Francis Ltd
Imprint:   Routledge
Dimensions:   Width: 15.60cm , Height: 1.60cm , Length: 23.40cm
Weight:   0.540kg
ISBN:  

9780415435826

ISBN 10:   041543582
Pages:   264
Publication Date:   22 March 2010
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Professional and scholarly ,  Tertiary & Higher Education ,  Undergraduate
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   In Print  
This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements. Abbreviations and Acronyms. Introduction. 1. Legitimacy and Effectiveness – Two Principal Standards of Good Governance 2. Assessing (Input/Output) Legitimacy 3. The EU Eco-Labelling Board Consultation Forum 4. The European Health Policy Forum 5. The Trade Contact Group and Civil Society Dialogue 6. The Agricultural Advisory Groups. Conclusion: Trapped between Legitimacy Claims – Managing Expectations for ECAFs. Bibliography

Reviews

Author Information

Portsmouth University, UK

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

No review item found!

Add your own review!

Countries Available

All regions