Overview

Full Product Details

9781793618238

Table of Contents

Reviews

Epictetus is an excellent choice for studying an ancient philosopher's attitudes toward non-philosophers. In this learned, wide-ranging, and well-conceived monograph, MacGillivray provides a probing account of this Stoic's frustrations with laypersons, his advice to students to be cautious around them, his various pedagogical appeals to paragons, and his hopes for ethical progress despite the ineradicable flaws we all share. This work fills a real gap in scholarship on Epictetus. --William O. Stephens, Creighton University

Epictetus is an excellent choice for studying an ancient philosopher's attitudes toward non-philosophers. In this learned, wide-ranging, and well-conceived monograph, MacGillivray provides a probing account of this Stoic's frustrations with laypersons, his advice to students to be cautious around them, his various pedagogical appeals to paragons, and his hopes for ethical progress despite the ineradicable flaws we all share. This work fills a real gap in scholarship on Epictetus.--William O. Stephens, Creighton University In the end, this book, whose prose is smooth and a pleasure to read, and which does not demand previous in-depth knowledge of Stoic philosophy or of Epictetus' thinking, allows for a good approach to a fascinating subject that is not much studied.-- Bryn Mawr Classical Review MacGillivray (independent scholar) explores these two questions in Epictetus. What distinguishes the philosopher from the non-philosopher? How can the non-philosopher illuminate the philosopher's views? The first part of the book treats the first question. Philosophers are people who can articulate their school's ideas and who live in accord with the philosophy's ethical demands. Laypeople, on the other hand, are subject to vices. Philosophers should, in general, avoid public engagement with laypeople. These conclusions set up the rest of the book, which investigates the second question. Here the layperson takes a more positive role, whether as virtuous early humans or as moderns supported by moral preconceptions, law, popular religion, and exempla. This book helps illuminate Epictetus's distinctive interest in discussing ordinary people, instead of hypothetical descriptions of the perfect, and impossible, Stoic sage. It likewise contributes to a greater understanding of Stoic philosophy's disinterest in venerating their founders and their willingness to find instruction in ideas and activities of those outside their school. . . the book is accessible to non-specialist audiences, as translations accompany Latin and Greek. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.-- Choice MacGillivray captures Epictetus's double-mindedness about non-philosophers with scholarly discipline and principled clarity. This book is rich with detail and is a useful lesson in how philosophers must manage the broader non-(and even anti-) philosophical culture in which they must live. --Scott Aikin, Vanderbilt University This new study on Epictetus is a must read for anyone intrigued by the influential practical philosophy of this ancient Roman sage.--Massimo Pigliucci PhD, author of How to Be Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life

""Epictetus is an excellent choice for studying an ancient philosopher's attitudes toward non-philosophers. In this learned, wide-ranging, and well-conceived monograph, MacGillivray provides a probing account of this Stoic's frustrations with laypersons, his advice to students to be cautious around them, his various pedagogical appeals to paragons, and his hopes for ethical progress despite the ineradicable flaws we all share. This work fills a real gap in scholarship on Epictetus."" ""MacGillivray captures Epictetus's double-mindedness about non-philosophers with scholarly discipline and principled clarity. This book is rich with detail and is a useful lesson in how philosophers must manage the broader non-(and even anti-) philosophical culture in which they must live. "" ""This new study on Epictetus is a must read for anyone intrigued by the influential practical philosophy of this ancient Roman sage."" In the end, this book, whose prose is smooth and a pleasure to read, and which does not demand previous in-depth knowledge of Stoic philosophy or of Epictetus' thinking, allows for a good approach to a fascinating subject that is not much studied. MacGillivray (independent scholar) explores these two questions in Epictetus. What distinguishes the philosopher from the non-philosopher? How can the non-philosopher illuminate the philosopher's views? The first part of the book treats the first question. Philosophers are people who can articulate their school's ideas and who live in accord with the philosophy's ethical demands. Laypeople, on the other hand, are subject to vices. Philosophers should, in general, avoid public engagement with laypeople. These conclusions set up the rest of the book, which investigates the second question. Here the layperson takes a more positive role, whether as virtuous early humans or as moderns supported by moral preconceptions, law, popular religion, and exempla. This book helps illuminate Epictetus's distinctive interest in discussing ordinary people, instead of hypothetical descriptions of the perfect, and impossible, Stoic sage. It likewise contributes to a greater understanding of Stoic philosophy's disinterest in venerating their founders and their willingness to find instruction in ideas and activities of those outside their school. . . the book is accessible to non-specialist audiences, as translations accompany Latin and Greek. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.

Author Information

Erlend D. MacGillivray received his PhD from the University of Aberdeen, Scotland, in 2018.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available