Free Delivery Over $100
|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Nicholas Mercuro , Steven G. MedemaPublisher: Princeton University Press Imprint: Princeton University Press Edition: Second Edition Dimensions: Width: 15.20cm , Height: 2.40cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 0.595kg ISBN: 9780691125725ISBN 10: 0691125724 Pages: 400 Publication Date: 20 August 2006 Audience: Professional and scholarly , College/higher education , Professional & Vocational , Tertiary & Higher Education Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand  We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Language: English Table of ContentsPreface ix Chapter 1: The Jurisprudential Niche of Law and Economics 1 Appendix A: The Theory of Market Failure 60 Appendix B: Efficiency Concepts in Law and Economics 68 Chapter 2: Chicago Law and Economics 94 Chapter 3: Public Choice Theory 156 Chapter 4: Institutional Law and Economics 208 Chapter 5: The New Institutional Economics 241 Chapter 6: Branching Out: New Haven, Modern Civic Republican, and Austrian Approaches 284 Chapter 7: Social Norms and Law and Economics 306 Bibliography 343 Index 375Reviews[This book] provides an excellent introduction to the broad contours of Law and Economics... It can be especially recommended to readers interested in short but very informative overviews on different aspects of this discipline. -- Hans-Bernd Schafer Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 'You can't tell the players without a scorecard,' or so vendors at a baseball game say, and the Mercuro and Medema book under review provides team scorecards and much more: intellectual histories and outlines of the dominant styles of play by the Chicago school and its New Haven opponents, the public choice school and its civic republican opposition, institutional and neoinstitutional economics, and critical legal studies as a postmodern counterweight to the various economics enterprises. -- Paul H. Brietzke Valparaiso University Law Review The authors' primary goal, which they achieve admirably, is to provide a concise review of the major scholarly traditions that use economic analysis of the law... [T]he descriptions of each tradition are clear and painstakingly evenhanded... This brief volume provides a sound understanding of each tradition's virtues and weaknesses. Constitutional Political Economy It is arguable that over the past 20 years, roughly the years of the Volker and Greenspan Federal Reserve Boards, the branch of study that goes by the name Law and Economics has had more influence on public economic policy than any other academic discourse... In the face of such a shift in thinking about public policy, it is important to have a fair-minded primer that clearly explains the various aspects of thinking about law and economics in the policy arena today. This book attempts to provide just such a primer. It is notable for the clarity and fairness of its exposition of what are controversial debates about the proper direction for economic policy. -- John Henry Schiegel Southern Economic Journal [This book] provides an excellent introduction to the broad contours of Law and Economics... It can be especially recommended to readers interested in short but very informative overviews on different aspects of this discipline. --Hans-Bernd Schfer, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 'You can't tell the players without a scorecard,' or so vendors at a baseball game say, and the Mercuro and Medema book under review provides team scorecards and much more: intellectual histories and outlines of the dominant styles of play by the Chicago school and its New Haven opponents, the public choice school and its civic republican opposition, institutional and neoinstitutional economics, and critical legal studies as a postmodern counterweight to the various economics enterprises. --Paul H. Brietzke, Valparaiso University Law Review The authors' primary goal, which they achieve admirably, is to provide a concise review of the major scholarly traditions that use economic analysis of the law... [T]he descriptions of each tradition are clear and painstakingly evenhanded... This brief volume provides a sound understanding of each tradition's virtues and weaknesses. -- Constitutional Political Economy It is arguable that over the past 20 years, roughly the years of the Volker and Greenspan Federal Reserve Boards, the branch of study that goes by the name Law and Economics has had more influence on public economic policy than any other academic discourse... In the face of such a shift in thinking about public policy, it is important to have a fair-minded primer that clearly explains the various aspects of thinking about law and economics in the policy arena today. This book attempts to provide just such a primer. It is notable for the clarity and fairness of its exposition of what are controversial debates about the proper direction for economic policy. --John Henry Schiegel, Southern Economic Journal [This book] provides an excellent introduction to the broad contours of Law and Economics... It can be especially recommended to readers interested in short but very informative overviews on different aspects of this discipline. -- Hans-Bernd Schafer, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 'You can't tell the players without a scorecard,' or so vendors at a baseball game say, and the Mercuro and Medema book under review provides team scorecards and much more: intellectual histories and outlines of the dominant styles of play by the Chicago school and its New Haven opponents, the public choice school and its civic republican opposition, institutional and neoinstitutional economics, and critical legal studies as a postmodern counterweight to the various economics enterprises. -- Paul H. Brietzke, Valparaiso University Law Review The authors' primary goal, which they achieve admirably, is to provide a concise review of the major scholarly traditions that use economic analysis of the law... [T]he descriptions of each tradition are clear and painstakingly evenhanded... This brief volume provides a sound understanding of each tradition's virtues and weaknesses. -- Constitutional Political Economy It is arguable that over the past 20 years, roughly the years of the Volker and Greenspan Federal Reserve Boards, the branch of study that goes by the name Law and Economics has had more influence on public economic policy than any other academic discourse... In the face of such a shift in thinking about public policy, it is important to have a fair-minded primer that clearly explains the various aspects of thinking about law and economics in the policy arena today. This book attempts to provide just such a primer. It is notable for the clarity and fairness of its exposition of what are controversial debates about the proper direction for economic policy. -- John Henry Schiegel, Southern Economic Journal Author InformationNicholas Mercuro is Professor of Law in Residence at Michigan State University College of Law and a faculty member of James Madison College. He has authored or edited seven books and is the founder and coeditor of the book series The Economics of Legal Relationships. Steven G. Medema, Professor of Economics at the University of Colorado at Denver, is the author of Ronald H. Coase and editor of the Journal of the History of Economic Thought. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
