Free Delivery Over $100
|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewA proposal for an interdisciplinary, context-sensitive framework for assessing the strength of scientific arguments that melds Jürgen Habermas's discourse theory and sociological contextualism. Recent years have seen a series of intense, increasingly acrimonious debates over the status and legitimacy of the natural sciences. These “science wars” take place in the public arena—with current battles over evolution and global warming—and in academia, where assumptions about scientific objectivity have been called into question. Given these hostilities, what makes a scientific claim merit our consideration? In Cogent Science in Context, William Rehg examines what makes scientific arguments cogent—that is, strong and convincing—and how we should assess that cogency. Drawing on the tools of argumentation theory, Rehg proposes a multidimensional, context-sensitive framework both for understanding the cogency of scientific arguments and for conducting cooperative interdisciplinary assessments of the cogency of actual scientific arguments. Rehg closely examines Jürgen Habermas's argumentation theory and its implications for understanding cogency, applying it to a case from high-energy physics. A series of problems, however, beset Habermas's approach. In response, Rehg outlines his own “critical contextualist” approach, which uses argumentation-theory categories in a new and more context-sensitive way inspired by ethnography of science. Full Product DetailsAuthor: William Rehg (Saint Louis University)Publisher: MIT Press Ltd Imprint: MIT Press Dimensions: Width: 15.20cm , Height: 2.20cm , Length: 22.90cm Weight: 0.635kg ISBN: 9780262182713ISBN 10: 0262182718 Pages: 360 Publication Date: 01 February 2009 Recommended Age: From 18 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: No Longer Our Product Availability: In Print  This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsReviewsRehg brilliantly summarizes the major debates in philosophy of science over the nature of discovery, explanation, and persuasion that have occurred over the last half-century while also providing the most informed critique of Habermasian discourse theory yet to appear. His judicious use of real-life examples drawn from Fermilab and elsewhere and his extension of argument theory to include the social visions that frame current hot-button academic disputes regarding global warming and intelligent design make his book extremely timely and indispensable reading for laypersons trying to assess scientific journalism and reporting. Rehg's riveting account of cogency will revolutionize the way critical theorists, logicians, and rhetoricians think about argumentation in general and, more particularly, about how we should assess the social institutionalization of collaborative research and debate in science proper for years to come. --David Ingram, Loyola University Chicago Author InformationWilliam Rehg is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Saint Louis University. He is the translator of Jürgen Habermas's Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (1996) and the coeditor of Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics and Pluralism (1997) and The Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory (2001), all published by the MIT Press. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
