Free Delivery Over $100
|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis book is one of the finest I have ever read. To write a foreword for it is an honor, difficult to accept. Everyone knows that architects and master masons, long before there were mathematical theories, erected structures of astonishing originality, strength, and beauty. Many of these still stand. Were it not for our now acid atmosphere, we could expect them to stand for centuries more. We admire early architects' visible success in the distribution and balance of thrusts, and we presume that master masons had rules, perhaps held secret, that enabled them to turn architects' bold designs into reality. Everyone knows that rational theories of strength and elasticity, created centuries later, were influenced by the wondrous buildings that men of the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries saw daily. Theorists know that when, at last, theories began to appear, architects distrusted them, partly because they often disregarded details of importance in actual construction, partly because nobody but a mathematician could understand the aim and func tion of a mathematical theory designed to represent an aspect of nature. This book is the first to show how statics, strength of materials, and elasticity grew alongside existing architecture with its millenial traditions, its host of successes, its ever-renewing styles, and its numerous problems of maintenance and repair. In connection with studies toward repair of the dome of St. Peter's by Poleni in 1743, on p. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Edoardo BenvenutoPublisher: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Imprint: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Edition: Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 1991 Dimensions: Width: 15.50cm , Height: 1.70cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 0.575kg ISBN: 9781461277453ISBN 10: 1461277450 Pages: 306 Publication Date: 21 September 2011 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand  We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of Contentsof Part I.- I The Principles of Statics.- 1 Methodological Preliminaries.- 1.1 The Special Objects That Gave Rise to Mechanics.- 1.2 The Enigma of Force and the Foundations of Mechanics.- 1.3 Statics as “Science Subordinated to Geometry as Well as to Natural Philosophy”.- 1.4 Momentum: Fixed Word, Fluid Concept.- 1.5 The Aristotelian Roots of a Vocabulary for Mechanics.- 1.6 A Short Outline of Aristotle’s Physical Principles.- 1.7 Modern Metamorphoses of the Immobile Mover: Towards the Principle of Conservation.- 1.8 The “Mechanical Problems”: The Peripatetic Explanation of the Law of the Lever and the Parallelogram Rule.- 2 The Law of the Lever.- 2.1 Archimedes’ Demonstrations.- 2.2 Interpretations (and Improvements) of Archimedes’ Proof.- 2.3 An Alternative Approach: Pseudo-Euclid and Huygens.- 2.4 Marchetti’s New Approach and Daviet de Foncenex’s Improvements.- 2.5 De la Hire’s Proof, Lagrange’s Remarks and Fourier’s Contribution.- 2.6 Towards the “Dethronement” of the Law of the Lever: Saccheri and de Maupertuis.- 3 The Principle of Virtual Velocities.- 3.1 Medieval Roots.- 3.2 Guidobaldo del Monte, Galileo, and the Principle.- of Virtual Velocities.- 3.3 Descartes: “Explicatio Machinarum Unico Tantum Principio”.- 3.4 Bernoulli and Varignon.- 3.5 Riccati’s “Universal Principle of Statics”.- 3.6 Lagrange’s First Demonstration.- 3.7 The Approaches of Fossombroni and Fourier.- 3.8 The Principle of Virtual Velocities and Constraints: Poinsot’s and Ampère’s Contributions and Lagrange’s Second Proof.- 4 The Parallelogram of Forces.- 4.1 Daniel Bernoulli’s Claim.- 4.2 Daniel Bernoulli’s First Geometrical Demonstration.- 4.3 Bülffinger’s Paradox.- 4.4 Riccati’s Solution.- 4.5 Foncenex’s Memoir and Lagrange’s Criticism.- 4.6 Foncenex’s Fundamental Lemma.- 4.7 Foncenex’s and D’Alembert’s Functional Equation.- 4.8 D’Alembert’s Memoir of 1769.- 4.9 Further Developments: D’Alembert, Poisson, Cauchy, Dorna and Darboux.- 4.10 Conclusion.- II De Resistentia Solidorum.- 5 Galileo and His “Problem”.- 5.1 Introduction.- 5.2 Galileo: A Short Account.- 5.3 The Subtext: Galileo’s Atomism.- 5.4 The Primacy of Geometry over Logic in the Discorsi.- 5.5 The First Day of the Discorsi.- 5.6 Attempts to Explain the Cause of Resistance.- 5.7 For and Against the Power of the Vacuum.- 5.8 First Intimations of an Atomistic Theory of Resistance.- 5.9 Democritus or Plato?.- 5.10 The Second Day.- 5.11 Opening Remarks.- 5.12 Corollaries.- 5.13 The Problem of Solids of Ultimate Dimensions.- 5.14 The Problem of Solids of Equal Resistance.- 6 First Studies on the Causes of Resistance.- 6.1 Experimental Confutations: The Horror Vacui.- 6.2 Mersenne and the Problem of Resistance.- 6.3 Descartes’ Concept: Stasis as the Best Adhesive.- 6.4 The Atomist Rossetti and His Explanation of Resistance.- 6.5 Atomism and Vacuum: Newton, Leibniz and Clarke.- 6.6 Newton’s “vis interna attrahens”: Elasticity and Resistance.- 6.7 Boscovich’s Reformation of the Old Atomism.- 6.8 Developments of Boscovich’s Theory: Early Nineteenth-Century Research on Elasticity.- 7 The Initial Growth of Galileo’s Problem.- 7.1 Introduction.- 7.2 First Steps in the Controversy about Solids of Equal Resistance: Blondel’s “Evidence”.- 7.3 Marchetti’s “Evidence” on Solids of Equal Resistance.- 7.4 Marchetti’s Axiomatic Approach to the Resistance of Solids.- 7.5 Viviani’s “Evidence”.- 7.6 Antony Terill and Solids of Ultimate Dimensions.- 7.7 Fabri: Elasticity as an “Intermediate Force”.- 7.8 Pardies’ Statics.- 8 Early Theories of the Strength of Materials.- 8.1 Elasticity Enters the Theory of Resistance.- 8.2 Mariotte’s Contribution.- 8.3 Leibniz’s New Demonstrations.- 8.4 New Problems: Catenaries and Elastic Curves.- 8.5 Jakob Bernoulli’s Fundamental Work.- 8.6 Varignon and the Galileo-Mariotte Dichotomy.- 8.7 Musschenbroek and the Imperfections of Matter.- 8.8 The Last of the Eighteenth-Century Treatises on Resistance.- Author Index.ReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
