Overview

This book orchestrates a convergence of two discourses from the 1960s—Nelson Goodman’s aesthetic theory on one side and critiques of modern architecture articulated by figures like Peter Blake, Charles Jencks, and Robert Venturi/Denise Scott Brown on the other. Grounded in Goodman’s aesthetic theory, the book explores his conceptual framework within the context of modern architecture. At the heart of the investigation lies Goodman’s concept of exemplification. While his notion of denotation pertains to representational elements, often ornaments, in architecture, exemplification accentuates specific formal properties at the expense of others, including color, spatial orientation, transparency, seriality, and the like. Supplemented by findings from phenomenology, the book traces these effects in buildings, notably those by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Walter Gropius, Le Corbusier, and Frank Lloyd Wright—all key figures in the critiques of modern architecture. Employing Goodman’s framework, the book aims to address accusations of emptiness and alienation directed at modern architecture in the postwar era. It illustrates that modern architecture symbolizes aesthetically in a fundamentally different way than architecture from earlier periods. This book will be of interest to architects, artists, researchers, and students in architecture, architectural history, theory, cultural theory, philosophy, and aesthetics.

Full Product Details

Author:   Kasper Lægring
Publisher:   Taylor & Francis Ltd
Imprint:   Routledge
Weight:   0.710kg
ISBN:  

9781032347424

ISBN 10:   1032347422
Pages:   280
Publication Date:   19 July 2024
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Tertiary & Higher Education
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   In Print  
This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements List of Figures Chapter 1: Introduction Reckoning with the critique of modern architecture A Goodmanian take on modern architecture and its critiques Defining the object of study Problems of demarcation The ideological basis for modern architecture in functionalist theory Current research into the praxis of modern architecture Chapter 2: Applying Goodman’s aesthetic theory to architecture Aesthetics and cognition Aesthetics and language Goodman as nominalist Right or wrong rather than true or false When does architecture take place? Goodman’s rejection of competing theories Languages of Art Symbol systems and symbol schemes Syntactic and semantic, notation, digital and analog Imperfect notational systems: Notational schemes Allographic, autographic and the steps of the design process Notational approaches: Score and script Notation and mixed symbol systems in architecture Denotation Fictitious denotation Exemplification Exemplification in modern architecture Expression (metaphorical exemplification) Feelings or moods? Complex and mediate modes of reference: Allusion, variation, style Allusion Variation Style Chapter 3: Symbolization in pre-modern architecture Renaissance architecture Mannerist architecture Baroque architecture Rococo architecture Neoclassical architecture Romanticist impulses Historicist architecture Chapter 4: Symbolization in the early phases of modern architecture The Chicago School Wainwright Building Art Nouveau, Jugendstil, Wiener Secession, and Catalan Modernisme Maison Coilliot Maison Horta Majolikahaus Casa Milà Willow Tearooms Adolf Loos Looshaus Expressionist architecture Het Schip Einsteinturm Glass architecture Chapter 5: The aesthetic implications of the critique of modern architecture The International Style exhibition in 1932 as a compass The aesthetically oriented critique of modern architecture, circa 1970 Chapter 6: Symbolization in modern architecture The International Style: Mies van der Rohe and the minimalism of glass and steel Illinois Institute of Technology General means of aesthetic symbolization in Mies’ formalistic architecture The International Style: Gropius, Bauhaus, and the factory aesthetic The Bauhaus building in Dessau Late works by Gropius Formalism and classicism in American federal and corporate International Style The International Style: Le Corbusier and Purism Les Quartiers Modernes Frugès in Pessac The white, cubist aesthetic of the villas of Loos and Le Corbusier Le Corbusier’s late works and the Brutalism of béton brut Unité d’habitation in Marseille Notre-Dame-du-Haut at Ronchamp The imprint of Brutalism on late modernism Frank Lloyd Wright and organic modernism Late works by Wright Fallingwater From Alvar Aalto to the notion of another modernism Chapter 7: Conclusion The hegemony of exemplification in modern architectural praxis The architecture of formalism: symbolic rather than silent Bibliography Index

Reviews

Goodman’s rigorous constructivist epistemology of symbol systems—especially Goodman’s logical typology for investigating their degree of “notationality”—to reassess the watershed transformation between pre modernist and modernist architecture in the mid-twentieth century. Partly through shedding almost all “denotation,” or reference to an external object, modernist architecture could sometimes approach the formal conditions of a pure notation. Nonetheless, it continued to work representationally by way of privileging “exemplification” (as analyzed by Goodman), both literal and metaphorical, and in this regard its “aesthetic symbolization did not diminish.” Lægring carefully and convincingly assesses the “degree of exemplification”—which can be surprisingly various—in a range of different projects by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Walter Gropius, Le Corbusier, and Frank Lloyd Wright. He shows not only that anti modernist objections to the formality and abstraction of high modernist architecture—alienating and even brutal—aren’t inherently misguided. But he also shows that its supposed ideal formality is not “meaninglessness”; rather, it creates a “choreographed appearance” that can be the vehicle of new forms of expression and allusion. Neither a defense nor a rejection of modernist architecture, Lægring’s subtle and sensitive analysis will appeal not only to historians and theorists of architecture and the modernist arts but also to philosophers, cognitive psychologists, and others interested in the symbol systems by which architecture and other arts help make our worlds.” Whitney Davis, George C. and Helen N. Pardee Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History and Theory of Ancient and Modern Art, University of California at Berkeley, USA “Among the merits of this book is to give semiotics back its proper place in the theory of architecture. To this end, Kasper Lægring goes back to Nelson Goodman’s aesthetic theory of 1968. He rightly places Goodman’s concept of exemplification at the center of his analysis of classical modern architecture. Lægring shows how, on the basis of Goodman’s aesthetics, it is not only possible to profitably reassess modernist architecture and the canonized criticism of its protagonists. Beyond this on the basis of semiotics the book succeeds in recalibrating the architecture of the 21st century. How the author links the historical foundation of contemporary architecture with its theoretical conceptualization makes the book so enriching and timely.” Jörg H. Gleiter, Professor of Architectural Theory, Technical University of Berlin, Germany “Kasper Lægring’s book, Nelson Goodman and Modern Architecture, proposes that the concept of exemplification, as offered in Goodman’s understanding of art in Languages of Art, serves as a key aesthetic reference mode when experiencing modern architecture. This perspective can account for the distinctive character of modern architecture. Exemplification is one of the dominant features of symbol systems cited by Goodman, calling for both possession and reference as properties of aesthetic symbols, including buildings. Lægring’s study focuses on the symbolic features of individual buildings, and by bringing a phenomenological perspective to the study of modern architecture, he insightfully combines Goodman’s aesthetic theory with developments in architectural phenomenology. In this book, Lægring effectively applies Goodman’s take on modern architecture to advance our understanding of both architectural symbolism and Goodman’s critical insights into modern architecture.” Curtis L. Carter, Professor of Philosophy, Marquette University, USA

"""In this insightful and innovative book, Kasper Lægring draws on Nelson Goodman’s rigorous constructivist epistemology of symbol systems—especially Goodman’s logical typology for investigating their degree of “notationality”—to reassess the watershed transformation between premodernist and modernist architecture in the mid-twentieth century. Partly through shedding almost all “denotation,” or reference to an external object, modernist architecture could sometimes approach the formal conditions of a pure notation. Nonetheless, it continued to work representationally by way of privileging “exemplification” (as analyzed by Goodman), both literal and metaphorical, and in this regard its “aesthetic symbolization did not diminish.” Lægring carefully and convincingly assesses the “degree of exemplification”—which can be surprisingly various—in a range of different projects by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Walter Gropius, Le Corbusier, and Frank Lloyd Wright. He shows not only that antimodernist objections to the formality and abstraction of high modernist architecture—alienating and even brutal—aren’t inherently misguided. But he also shows that its supposed ideal formality is not “meaninglessness”; rather, it creates a “choreographed appearance” that can be the vehicle of new forms of expression and allusion. Neither a defense nor a rejection of modernist architecture, Lægring’s subtle and sensitive analysis will appeal not only to historians and theorists of architecture and the modernist arts but also to philosophers, cognitive psychologists, and others interested in the symbol systems by which architecture and other arts help make our worlds.” Whitney Davis, George C. and Helen N. Pardee Distinguished Professor Emeritus of History and Theory of Ancient and Modern Art, University of California at Berkeley, USA “Among the merits of this book is to give semiotics back its proper place in the theory of architecture. To this end, Kasper Lægring goes back to Nelson Goodman’s aesthetic theory of 1968. He rightly places Goodman’s concept of exemplification at the center of his analysis of classical modern architecture. Lægring shows how, on the basis of Goodman’s aesthetics, it is not only possible to profitably reassess modernist architecture and the canonized criticism of its protagonists. Beyond this on the basis of semiotics the book succeeds in recalibrating the architecture of the 21st century. How the author links the historical foundation of contemporary architecture with its theoretical conceptualization makes the book so enriching and timely.” Jörg H. Gleiter, Professor of Architectural Theory, Technical University of Berlin, Germany “Kasper Lægring’s book, Nelson Goodman and Modern Architecture, proposes that the concept of exemplification, as offered in Goodman’s understanding of art in Languages of Art, serves as a key aesthetic reference mode when experiencing modern architecture. This perspective can account for the distinctive character of modern architecture. Exemplification is one of the dominant features of symbol systems cited by Goodman, calling for both possession and reference as properties of aesthetic symbols, including buildings. Lægring’s study focuses on the symbolic features of individual buildings, and by bringing a phenomenological perspective to the study of modern architecture, he insightfully combines Goodman’s aesthetic theory with developments in architectural phenomenology. In this book, Lægring effectively applies Goodman’s take on modern architecture to advance our understanding of both architectural symbolism and Goodman’s critical insights into modern architecture.” Curtis L. Carter, Professor of Philosophy, Marquette University, USA"

Author Information

Kasper Lægring is a theorist of architecture and the arts, a curator, and currently a New Carlsberg Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow in Art History at Aarhus University. He is serving as the Second Vice President of the European Architectural History Network for the period 2024–2026 (with Panagiotis Farantatos). With research degrees in architecture (MS, University of Pennsylvania; PhD, The Royal Danish Academy School of Architecture) and art history (Mag.art., University of Copenhagen), he has received recognition such as the Gold Medal of the University of Copenhagen. His studies and research have been supported by numerous prestigious institutions, including the J. William Fulbright Commission, the New Carlsberg Foundation, and the ZEIT-Stiftung Ebelin und Gerd Bucerius. Some recent notable publications include contributions to A Cultural History of the Avant-Garde in the Nordic Countries (Brill, 2022) and The Contested Territory of Architectural Theory (Routledge, 2022). This book is a revised and expanded version of his PhD dissertation.

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

No review item found!

Add your own review!

Countries Available

All regions