|
|
|||
|
||||
Awards
OverviewBy what criteria should public policy be evaluated? Fairness and justice? Or the welfare of individuals? Debate over this fundamental question has spanned the ages. Fairness versus Welfare poses a bold challenge to contemporary moral philosophy by showing that most moral principles conflict more sharply with welfare than is generally recognized. In particular, the authors demonstrate that all principles that are not based exclusively on welfare will sometimes favor policies under which literally everyone would be worse off. The book draws on the work of moral philosophers, economists, evolutionary and cognitive psychologists, and legal academics to scrutinize a number of particular subjects that have engaged legal scholars and moral philosophers. How can the deeply problematic nature of all nonwelfarist principles be reconciled with our moral instincts and intuitions that support them? The authors offer a fascinating explanation of the origins of our moral instincts and intuitions, developing ideas originally advanced by Hume and Sidgwick and more recently explored by psychologists and evolutionary theorists. Their analysis indicates that most moral principles that seem appealing, upon examination, have a functional explanation, one that does not justify their being accorded independent weight in the assessment of public policy. Fairness versus Welfare has profound implications for the theory and practice of policy analysis and has already generated considerable debate in academia. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Louis Kaplow , Steven ShavellPublisher: Harvard University Press Imprint: Harvard University Press Edition: New edition Dimensions: Width: 16.20cm , Height: 3.20cm , Length: 25.40cm Weight: 0.975kg ISBN: 9780674023642ISBN 10: 0674023641 Pages: 576 Publication Date: 01 September 2006 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Out of stock The supplier is temporarily out of stock of this item. It will be ordered for you on backorder and shipped when it becomes available. Table of ContentsReviews[Kaplow and Shavell] challenge [the] conventional wisdom. They argue that what matters most is whether a particular policy promotes the general welfare, saying we discover very little basis for the use of notions of fairness as independent evaluative principles. .. Fairness Versus Welfare is academically rigorous and intellectually challenging. Kaplow and Shavell have rolled a philosophical hand grenade into the practical world of policy. -- Doug Bandow Washington Times (08/09/2002) Author InformationLouis Kaplow is Caspersen and Household International Professor of Law and Economics at Harvard Law School. Steven Shavell is Samuel R. Rosenthal Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |