|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewFollowing the disintegration of the Soviet bloc, many Central and Eastern European Countries launched a vigorous 'return to Europe' campaign, which primarily focused on accession to NATO and the European Union. By 2007, ten countries became members of the Euro-Atlantic community, personifying the long-awaited reunification of Europe. Full Product DetailsAuthor: A. LasasPublisher: Palgrave Macmillan Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan Dimensions: Width: 14.00cm , Height: 0.10cm , Length: 21.60cm Weight: 0.437kg ISBN: 9780230100015ISBN 10: 0230100015 Pages: 213 Publication Date: 14 May 2010 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsIntroduction: Explaining NATO and EU Enlargement The 'Black Trinity' and the Cold War NATO Enlargement EU EnlargementReviews<p> In a provocative and well-documented comparative analysis of NATO and EU enlargements, Lasas provides a compelling explanation for the timing and scope of institutional expansions. This book engages the most salient debates in contemporary IR theorizing--from historical legacies to the role of norms, interests, and identities. --Christine Ingebritsen, University of Washington<p> Lasas offers an insightful account of the role of history and morality in European integration specifically and international politics in general. He provides an in-depth analysis of how domestic actors in both 'East' and 'West' negotiated the fundamental transformation from behind the 'Iron Curtain' to within the European Union, and in so doing, offers a fresh critique of the legacy of the Cold War on EU and NATO enlargement. --David Galbreath, University of Aberdeen<p> This book makes the novel argument that the EU and NATO were enlarged primarily because key Western states felt guilt about earlier abuse suffered by the states of Central and Eastern Europe during the 'black trinity' of Munich, Molotov-Ribbentrop, and Yalta. The book is certain to provoke a spirited response from defenders of interest and norm-based theories. --Wade Jacoby, Brigham Young University <p> In a provocative and well-documented comparative analysis of NATO and EU enlargements, Lasas provides a compelling explanation for the timing and scope of institutional expansions. This book engages the most salient debates in contemporary IR theorizing--from historical legacies to the role of norms, interests, and identities. --Christine Ingebritsen, University of Washington<p> Lasas offers an insightful account of the role of history and morality in European integration specifically and international politics in general. He provides an in-depth analysis of how domestic actors in both 'East' and 'West' negotiated the fundamental transformation from behind the 'Iron Curtain' to within the European Union, and in so doing, offers a fresh critique of the legacy of the Cold War on EU and NATO enlargement. --David Galbreath, University of Aberdeen<p> This book makes the novel argument that the EU and NATO were enlarged primarily because key Western states felt guilt about earlier abuse """In a provocative and well-documented comparative analysis of NATO and EU enlargements, La as provides a compelling explanation for the timing and scope of institutional expansions. This book engages the most salient debates in contemporary IR theorizing - from historical legacies to the role of norms, interests, and identities."" - Christine Ingebritsen, University of Washington ""La as offers an insightful account of the role of history and morality in European integration specifically and international politics in general. He provides an in-depth analysis of how domestic actors in both East and West negotiated the fundamental transformation from behind the Iron Curtain to within the European Union, and in so doing, offers a fresh critique of the legacy of the Cold War on EU and NATO enlargement."" - David Galbreath, University of Aberdeen ""This book makes the novel argument that the EU and NATO were enlarged primarily because key Western states felt guilt about earlier abuse suffered by the states of Central and Eastern Europe during the black trinity of Munich, Molotov-Ribbentrop, and Yalta. The book is certain to provoke a spirited response from defenders of interest and norm-based theories."" - Wade Jacoby, Brigham Young University" Author InformationAINIUS LAŠAS is Postdoctoral Fellow at the UNU Institute for Sustainability and Peace in Tokyo, Japan. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |