|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Yuval Shany (Hersch Lauterpacht Chair in Public International Law, Hersch Lauterpacht Chair in Public International Law, Hebrew University, Jerusalem)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 15.70cm , Height: 1.80cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 0.522kg ISBN: 9780198794318ISBN 10: 0198794312 Pages: 344 Publication Date: 11 August 2016 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of ContentsIntroduction Part I: The Goal-Based Approach 1: A Goal-Based Approach to Effectiveness Analysis 2: The Goals of International Courts 3: Measuring Goal Attainment Part II: Application of the Goal-Based Approach to Judicial Functions and Features 4: Jurisdictional Powers and Issues of Admissibility 5: Judicial Independence and Impartiality 6: Judgment-Compliance 7: Legitimacy Part III: Application of the Goal-Based Approach to Specific Courts 8: Yuval Shany and Rotem Giladi: The International Court of Justice 9: Yuval Shany and Sivan Shlomo: WTO Dispute Settlement System 10: Yuval Shany, Gilad Noam, and Sigall Horovitz: The International Criminal Court 11: Yuval Shany and Henry Lovat: European Court of Human Rights 12: Yuval Shany and Thorbjorn Bjornsson: European Court of Justice ConclusionsReviews`Are international courts effective? Scholars must decide whether the conceptual framework proposed by Shany is put to best use in a comparative analysis across different international courts, in an assessment of the effectiveness of an individual court on its own, or in both forms of application. Nevertheless, although future research will be instrumental in testing the methodology and concepts as developed, shining a spotlight on effectiveness is an important contribution.' Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, American Journal of International Law `Professor Shany's book is an extremely far-reaching and exhaustive study. For lawyers, particularly those concerned with the work of international courts, the great merit of the book is that it guides the reader to look beyond a court's judgments and opinions, and form a realistic picture of the actual impact beyond the courtroom that these may make, and in Professor Shany's apt terminology, to look beyond the 'output' of the court, and discern and assess the 'outcome'.' Hugh Thirlway, Netherlands International Law Review `Rather than assessing effectiveness according to one or more of the usual indicators -- compliance with decisions, usage rates, impact on the conduct of parties - he puts forward a 'conceptual framework to analyze questions about the effectiveness of international courts, which could serve as the basis for future research programs'. Put differently, the book's focus is not on whether international courts are effective, but on how their effectiveness should be assessed. If judged by its title, this book makes for a surprising read. But it is a welcome surprise, and an enriching one. The conceptual framework set out is indeed 'sophisticated and complex', and it is presented in a tightly argued and dense manner. So all things considered, perhaps this book should be seen as a prologue to a new, and higher, level of engagement with effectiveness.' Christian Tams, European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2015 `Shany's efforts to take seriously the exhortations towards effectiveness directed at international courts have led him to develop an ambitious goal-based analysis that proves successful in its application to a range of different institutions.' Gleider I. Hernandez, The European Journal of International Law Are international courts effective? Scholars must decide whether the conceptual framework proposed by Shany is put to best use in a comparative analysis across different international courts, in an assessment of the effectiveness of an individual court on its own, or in both forms of application. Nevertheless, although future research will be instrumental in testing the methodology and concepts as developed, shining a spotlight on effectiveness is an important contribution. Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, American Journal of International Law Professor Shany's book is an extremely far-reaching and exhaustive study. For lawyers, particularly those concerned with the work of international courts, the great merit of the book is that it guides the reader to look beyond a court's judgments and opinions, and form a realistic picture of the actual impact beyond the courtroom that these may make, and in Professor Shany's apt terminology, to look beyond the 'output' of the court, and discern and assess the 'outcome'. Hugh Thirlway, Netherlands International Law Review Rather than assessing effectiveness according to one or more of the usual indicators - compliance with decisions, usage rates, impact on the conduct of parties - he puts forward a 'conceptual framework to analyze questions about the effectiveness of international courts, which could serve as the basis for future research programs'. Put differently, the book's focus is not on whether international courts are effective, but on how their effectiveness should be assessed. If judged by its title, this book makes for a surprising read. But it is a welcome surprise, and an enriching one. The conceptual framework set out is indeed 'sophisticated and complex', and it is presented in a tightly argued and dense manner. So all things considered, perhaps this book should be seen as a prologue to a new, and higher, level of engagement with effectiveness. Christian Tams, European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2015 Shany's efforts to take seriously the exhortations towards effectiveness directed at international courts have led him to develop an ambitious goal-based analysis that proves successful in its application to a range of different institutions. Gleider I. Hernandez, The European Journal of International Law Shany's efforts to take seriously the exhortations towards effectiveness directed at international courts have led him to develop an ambitious goal-based analysis that proves successful in its application to a range of different institutions. * Gleider I. Hernandez, The European Journal of International Law * Rather than assessing effectiveness according to one or more of the usual indicators - compliance with decisions, usage rates, impact on the conduct of parties - he puts forward a 'conceptual framework to analyze questions about the effectiveness of international courts, which could serve as the basis for future research programs'. Put differently, the book's focus is not on whether international courts are effective, but on how their effectiveness should be assessed. If judged by its title, this book makes for a surprising read. But it is a welcome surprise, and an enriching one. The conceptual framework set out is indeed 'sophisticated and complex', and it is presented in a tightly argued and dense manner. So all things considered, perhaps this book should be seen as a prologue to a new, and higher, level of engagement with effectiveness. * Christian Tams, European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2015 * Professor Shany's book is an extremely far-reaching and exhaustive study. For lawyers, particularly those concerned with the work of international courts, the great merit of the book is that it guides the reader to look beyond a court's judgments and opinions, and form a realistic picture of the actual impact beyond the courtroom that these may make, and in Professor Shany's apt terminology, to look beyond the 'output' of the court, and discern and assess the 'outcome'. * Hugh Thirlway, Netherlands International Law Review * Are international courts effective? Scholars must decide whether the conceptual framework proposed by Shany is put to best use in a comparative analysis across different international courts, in an assessment of the effectiveness of an individual court on its own, or in both forms of application. Nevertheless, although future research will be instrumental in testing the methodology and concepts as developed, shining a spotlight on effectiveness is an important contribution. * Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, American Journal of International Law * Author InformationProfessor Yuval Shany is the Hersch Lauterpacht Chair in International Law at the Law Faculty of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He also serves currently as the academic director of the Minerva Center for Human Rights, a director in the International Law Forum at the Hebrew University, and the Project on International Courts and Tribunals (PICT) and a member of the steering committee of the DOMAC project (assessing the impact of international courts on domestic criminal procedures in mass atrocity cases). Shany has degrees in law from the Hebrew University (LL.B, 1995 cum laude), New York University (LL.M., 1997), and the University of London (Ph.D., 2001) and he has published a number of books and articles on international courts and arbitration tribunals and other international law issues such as international human rights and international humanitarian law. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |