|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewIn the future, (AI) robotic will be one emotion machine tool to help employers to solve customer emotion challenge to change their negative emotion to positive emotion more easily. So, in service industy wage determination can be measured more reasonable or fair or equality when the robotic can participate to every service with the service staff. For example, in one restaurant, one waitor and another waitor are needing to deliver the right food and write the food choice for every eatting customer. Every the roboic will help either him or her to deliver whose writing food record to the cooker to prepare to cook. So, the two waitor can concentrate on writing food record for every new eatting customer in the restaurant. Also they can indicate the robotic deliver the right food to the right eatting customer in every table. So, if the waitor has more complain concern his or her service performance every day. Then, the restaurant manager can evaluate whether who has better service performance when robotic can participate to share their workload. Of course, the less complain number to the watitor who ought pay higher wage to compare the more complain number waitor, so it seems that robotic job participation with the restaurant waitor's job which can measure the more reason or equal or fair wage determination. So, it explains why robotic job participation can assist any service industry to determinate who ought receive higher salary or who ought receive less salary.The standard economic model of consumer behavioral (AI) robotic service tool advantages includes: A logically consistent theory of consumer behavior can be built, that theory can be used to make predictions about consumer behavior and those predictions can be compared with reality and those models often correspond to actual behavior of consumption reasons. What is the inconvenient truth? It includes clear evidence from psychology has shown that the rationality assumptions of standard economic model are wrong. Evidence from psychology has shown that consumers often are irrational and also who are predictably irrational. So these are wrong view point to influence how economists judge what cause consumption of behavior. Thus, it beings this question? What is mean of predictably irrational? It means that of irrational consumers were irrational in random ways, who would cancel each other out, leaving the overall outcomes determined by the behavioral consumption of rational consumers. As that case, behavioral economic theories that ignored irrational behavioral consumption would work just fine. But, psychology has shown that consumers are irrational in similar and predictable ways. Therefore, irrationality doesn't cancel out and can't be ignored to judge why the behavioral consumption has been caused. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Johnny Ch LokPublisher: Independently Published Imprint: Independently Published Dimensions: Width: 21.60cm , Height: 0.50cm , Length: 28.00cm Weight: 0.259kg ISBN: 9781792854415ISBN 10: 1792854412 Pages: 102 Publication Date: 29 December 2018 Audience: General/trade , General Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Temporarily unavailable The supplier advises that this item is temporarily unavailable. It will be ordered for you and placed on backorder. Once it does come back in stock, we will ship it out to you. Table of ContentsReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |